Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 1:44:21 GMT -5
The defendant-plaintiff husband's attorney stated in his petition dated that some of the jewelry was used for household needs and treatment expenses to have a child . Jewelry worn by a woman during marriage is considered donated to her, regardless of who wore it. Since the plaintiff-defendant husband has not proven that these were given to the husband without asking for them back, it is not correct to decide to reject the defendant-counter-plaintiff woman's case regarding the ornaments in writing, although it should be accepted. Suprem14/4993 E. -counter-defendant man was entirely at fault for the events that caused the marital union to be shaken from its foundations, the man's divorce case was rejected and the woman's divorce case was accepted and the divorce was decided; From the trial held and the evidence collected, it is understood that in addition to the faulty behavior of the plaintiff-counter-defendant man determined by the court, the defendant-counter- plaintiff woman does not want to have children , calls her husband "not a man" and does not show interest in her husband's family.
According to this situation, the plaintiff-counterdefendant France Telegram Number Data man is also right to file a lawsuit. The defendant-plaintiff husband's attorney stated in his petition dated that some of the jewelry was used for household needs and treatment expenses to have a child . Jewelry worn by a woman during marriage is considered donated to her, regardless of who wore it. Since the plaintiff-defendant husband has not proven that these were given to the husband without asking for them back, it is not correct to decide to reject the defendant-counter-plaintiff woman's case regarding the ornaments in writing, although it should be accepted. Suprem14/4993 E.
Although the court determined that the plaintiff-counter-defendant man was entirely at fault for the events that caused the marital union to be shaken from its foundations, the man's divorce case was rejected and the woman's divorce case was accepted and the divorce was decided; From the trial held and the evidence collected, it is understood that in addition to the faulty behavior of the plaintiff-counter-defendant man determined by the court, the defendant-counter- plaintiff woman does not want to have children , calls her husband "not a man" and does not show interest in her husband's family. According to this situation, the plaintiff-counterdefendant man is also right to file a lawsuit.
According to this situation, the plaintiff-counterdefendant France Telegram Number Data man is also right to file a lawsuit. The defendant-plaintiff husband's attorney stated in his petition dated that some of the jewelry was used for household needs and treatment expenses to have a child . Jewelry worn by a woman during marriage is considered donated to her, regardless of who wore it. Since the plaintiff-defendant husband has not proven that these were given to the husband without asking for them back, it is not correct to decide to reject the defendant-counter-plaintiff woman's case regarding the ornaments in writing, although it should be accepted. Suprem14/4993 E.
Although the court determined that the plaintiff-counter-defendant man was entirely at fault for the events that caused the marital union to be shaken from its foundations, the man's divorce case was rejected and the woman's divorce case was accepted and the divorce was decided; From the trial held and the evidence collected, it is understood that in addition to the faulty behavior of the plaintiff-counter-defendant man determined by the court, the defendant-counter- plaintiff woman does not want to have children , calls her husband "not a man" and does not show interest in her husband's family. According to this situation, the plaintiff-counterdefendant man is also right to file a lawsuit.